Wow! I've only been blogging for about 3 weeks now, and already I've achieved the coveted position of #966 on the Truth Laid Bear ranking of weblogs by average daily traffic!
With a little hard work and application, I'm sure I can get it up there to #950 or so!
Of course, it might help if I actually wrote something worth reading instead of posting all this filler and links to the Same Old Gang of liberal bloggers -- you know the sorry bunch of them: Marshall, Drum, Kos, Gilliard, Billmon, Atrios, Hesiod, Demosthenes, Ailes, Spencer, Yglesias and the hive-mind that is TAPPED -- but frankly I'm been pretty exhausted lately and this is about all I'm good for. Any kind of rational analysis requires, at the very least, the ability to think three or four coherent thoughts in succession, and as for insight ... well, forget it, that takes a least one good night's sleep, two would be better.
I did have one interesting question to pose, though.
When I first began to think seriously about starting a blog, I read all sorts of stuff that people had written about why they blog, with the intention of perhaps using it as fodder for an entry. I later decided not to do that, but it remains a good question.
In the play I'm in rehearsal for, The Violet Hour, the playwright, Richard Greenberg, asks a similar, but more general question. Early on in Act Two, the main character says:
Why are we all such recordists? [...]
Everyone’s taking everything down as if it’s historical, as if it’s historic.
As if it’s witty or sums up the Times.
All of us confident, all of us acquiver with self-importance.
And why is that, indeed? Why are there so many memoirs published, many of them by people otherwise unknown? Why do people get the urge to blog? Why do I write these thoughts in a public venue instead of in a diary or journal?
I have no answers, of course, answers requiring (again) coherent thought (at least).
In the last few weeks or so, Kevin Drum on CalPundit has cautioned a few times against "blog triumphalism", the idea that blogging is a new and terribly influential factor in the nation's political intercourse. I understand what he's saying, that's it's too new and too limited in its scope and therefore shouldn't be credited with more influence than it has, but I think the flip side is that for people, like myself, who have discovered political blogs, there's been a revelation of an entirely new and hiterto unknown layer of discourse. It's not a uninformed barroom argument (although it can share some of the characteristics of one), but neither is it the usual give-of-take of the same-old annointed elites of punditry. It's a treasure trove of voices most of whom I would never have been exposed to, except for the vehicle of blogging
So while it's good to avoid overselling the blog factor, it's also good to celebrate blogs, especially political blogs (and most especially liberal political blogs) as, overall, a very positive thing. Without them, I wouldn't have "met" the Same Old Gang of liberal bloggers I listed above, all of whom have done much to help clarify for me our dire political situation. I don't know why they, in particular, and other liberal bloggers as well, were driven to become public recordists of these times and their thoughts on it, but I'm certainly glad they did.
Update (9/21/03): That ranking above, #966, is rather deceptive, because on the TTLB Blogosphere Ecosystem, which I take to be a more accurate representation of blogging status, I'm currently lowly #3296, and dwell in the "Crusty Crustacean" category (sounds like something from "Sponge Bob Square Pants"), only three slots up from the bottom.
Still, I take comfort from the thought that there are almost a thousand bloggers below me, while I try to overtake the more than three thousand above me on my way to world dominance.
It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail. Gore Vidal
Many thanks to my 15 Loyal Readers who keep me out of the cellar!
absolutist
aggresive
anti-Constitutional
anti-intellectual
arrogant
authoritarian
blame-placers
blameworthy
blinkered
buckpassers
calculating
class warriors
clueless
compassionless
con artists
conniving
conscienceless
conspiratorial
corrupt
craven
criminal
crooked
culpable
damaging
dangerous
deadly
debased
deceitful
delusional
despotic
destructive
devious
disconnected
dishonorable
dishonest
disingenuous
disrespectful
dogmatic
doomed
fanatical
fantasists
felonious
hateful
heinous
hostile to science
hypocritical
ideologues
ignorant
immoral
incompetent
indifferent
inflexible
insensitive
insincere
irrational
isolated
kleptocratic
lacking in empathy
lacking in public spirit
liars
mendacious
misleading
mistrustful
non-rational
not candid
not "reality-based"
not trustworthy
oblivious
oligarchic
opportunistic
out of control
pernicious
perverse
philistine
plutocratic
prevaricating
propagandists
rapacious
relentless
reprehensible
rigid
scandalous
schemers
selfish
secretive
shameless
sleazy
tricky
unAmerican
uncaring
uncivil
uncompromising
unconstitutional
undemocratic
unethical
unpopular
unprincipled
unrealistic
unreliable
unrepresentative
unscientific
unscrupulous
unsympathetic
venal
vile
virtueless
warmongers
wicked
without integrity
wrong-headed
Thanks to: Breeze, Chuck, Ivan Raikov, Kaiju, Kathy, Roger, Shirley, S.M. Dixon
recently seen
i've got a little list...
Elliott Abrams
Steven Abrams (Kansas BofE)
David Addington
Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson
Roger Ailes (FNC)
John Ashcroft
Bob Bennett
William Bennett
Joe Biden
John Bolton
Alan Bonsell (Dover BofE)
Pat Buchanan
Bill Buckingham (Dover BofE)
George W. Bush
Saxby Chambliss
Bruce Chapman (DI)
Dick Cheney
Lynne Cheney
Richard Cohen
The Coors Family
Ann Coulter
Michael Crichton
Lanny Davis
Tom DeLay
William A. Dembski
James Dobson
Leonard Downie (WaPo)
Dinesh D’Souza
Gregg Easterbrook
Jerry Falwell
Douglas Feith
Arthur Finkelstein
Bill Frist
George Gilder
Newt Gingrich
John Gibson (FNC)
Alberto Gonzalez
Rudolph Giuliani
Sean Hannity
Katherine Harris
Fred Hiatt (WaPo)
Christopher Hitchens
David Horowitz
Don Imus
James F. Inhofe
Jesse Jackson
Philip E. Johnson
Daryn Kagan
Joe Klein
Phil Kline
Ron Klink
William Kristol
Ken Lay
Joe Lieberman
Rush Limbaugh
Trent Lott
Frank Luntz
"American Fundamentalists"
by Joel Pelletier
(click on image for more info)
Chris Matthews
Mitch McConnell
Stephen C. Meyer (DI)
Judith Miller (ex-NYT)
Zell Miller
Tom Monaghan
Sun Myung Moon
Roy Moore
Dick Morris
Rupert Murdoch
Ralph Nader
John Negroponte
Grover Norquist
Robert Novak
Ted Olson
Elspeth Reeve (TNR)
Bill O'Reilly
Martin Peretz (TNR)
Richard Perle
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ralph Reed
Pat Robertson
Karl Rove
Tim Russert
Rick Santorum
Richard Mellon Scaife
Antonin Scalia
Joe Scarborough
Susan Schmidt (WaPo)
Bill Schneider
Al Sharpton
Ron Silver
John Solomon (WaPo)
Margaret Spellings
Kenneth Starr
Randall Terry
Clarence Thomas
Richard Thompson (TMLC)
Donald Trump
Richard Viguere
Donald Wildmon
Paul Wolfowitz
Bob Woodward (WaPo)
John Yoo
guest-blogging
All the fine sites I've
guest-blogged for:
Be sure to visit them all!!
recent listening
influences
John Adams
Laurie Anderson
Aphex Twin
Isaac Asimov
Fred Astaire
J.G. Ballard
The Beatles
Busby Berkeley
John Cage
"Catch-22"
Raymond Chandler
Arthur C. Clarke
Elvis Costello
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Philip K. Dick
Kevin Drum
Brian Eno
Fela
Firesign Theatre
Eliot Gelwan
William Gibson
Philip Glass
David Gordon
Stephen Jay Gould
Dashiell Hammett
"The Harder They Come"
Robert Heinlein
Joseph Heller
Frank Herbert
Douglas Hofstadter
Bill James
Gene Kelly
Stanley Kubrick
Jefferson Airplane
Ursula K. LeGuin
The Marx Brothers
John McPhee
Harry Partch
Michael C. Penta
Monty Python
Orbital
Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger
"The Prisoner"
"The Red Shoes"
Steve Reich
Terry Riley
Oliver Sacks
Erik Satie
"Singin' in the Rain"
Stephen Sondheim
The Specials
Morton Subotnick
Talking Heads/David Byrne
Tangerine Dream
Hunter S. Thompson
J.R.R. Tolkien
"2001: A Space Odyssey"
Kurt Vonnegut
Yes
Bullshit, trolling, unthinking knee-jerk dogmatism and the drivel of idiots will be ruthlessly deleted and the posters banned.
Entertaining, interesting, intelligent, informed and informative comments will always be welcome, even when I disagree with them.
I am the sole judge of which of these qualities pertains.
E-mail
All e-mail received is subject to being published on unfutz without identifying names or addresses.
Corrections
I correct typos and other simple errors of grammar, syntax, style and presentation in my posts after the fact without necessarily posting notification of the change.
Substantive textual changes, especially reversals or major corrections, will be noted in an "Update" or a footnote.
Also, illustrations may be added to entries after their initial publication.
the story so far
unfutz: toiling in almost complete obscurity for almost 1500 days
If you read unfutz at least once a week, without fail, your teeth will be whiter and your love life more satisfying.
If you read it daily, I will come to your house, kiss you on the forehead, bathe your feet, and cook pancakes for you, with yummy syrup and everything.
(You might want to keep a watch on me, though, just to avoid the syrup ending up on your feet and the pancakes on your forehead.)
Finally, on a more mundane level, since I don't believe that anyone actually reads this stuff, I make this offer: I'll give five bucks to the first person who contacts me and asks for it -- and, believe me, right now five bucks might as well be five hundred, so this is no trivial offer.