Since my family went to the NY Mets/Colorado Rockies game at broiling-hot Shea Stadium this afternoon (where the Mets beat the Rockies to sweep their 3-game series), and since we've now past the three-quarters mark for the baseball season, it seems like a good time to look in on how the Rockies great experiment in Christian Professional Baseball is going.
(To those who are unfamiliar with the Rockies announced status as a Christian ballclub, see this post and my followups here and here.)
Before we look at how they're doing, I would like to emphasize that I keep returning to this subject not out of any particular animosity towards Christians or Christianity (or ballplayers who happen to be Christian), but because I'm appalled that a professional baseball team would make decisions about how to run their team (which players to retain or release, for instance) on any other basis except those pertinent to baseball. It's bad enough that monetary issues play a significant part in a general manager's decisions in the modern game, to overlay religious criteria on top of that is wrong, just as wrong as the the banning of black players prior to Jackie Robinson.
So, how has a commitment to being a Christian team worked out for the Rockies? It certainly hasn't been a recipe for success in any absolute way, as a look at their stats will show:
currently: 59-65 / 6 games under .500 / division: tied for last (3rd) place, 7 games behind the Dodgers / wild card: 4-way tie for 4th place, 5 games behind Cincinatti.
That's worse than the other times I checked on them:
May 30 (when the USA Today article came out): at .500 / division: last (5th) place, 4.5 games behind / wild card: 7th place, 3.5 games out
July 9 (All-Star Break): 1 game over .500 / division: 3rd place, 3.5 games behind / wild card: 2nd place / 1.5 games behind
August 8: 3 games under .500 / division: 4th place, 4 games behind / wild card: 4th place, 2.5 games behind
Things are not getting better for the Rockies, they're getting worse.
Of course, there are other ways to measure success. Compared to last season , for instance -- when they finished in last place in the NL West, 15 games behind the Padres, with a sub-.500 winning percentage (.414), and tied for dead last in the Wild Card, 22 games out -- they're actually not doing nearly as badly.
Also, they may have figured out how to survive playing baseball in the high altitude of Denver, where thin air allows balls to travel farther and prevents pitches from breaking. The Rockies pitchers usually have one of the worse earned run averages in baseball because of this, but this season that seems to have changed for some reason -- before the Mets' series, the Rockies were leading the entire NL in team ERA with 4.06, with the Mets right behind them at 4.11. (They've swapped places now, with the Mets at 4.05 and the Rockies at 4.08, but that's still fairly amazing considering the conditions they have to play their home games under.)
So... all is not lost, it's still possible (if increasingly improbable) that the Rockies could squeak into the post-season, but the evidence does seem to be mounting that choosing to shape and run your team on Christian principles rather than baseball principles is not a good winning strategy. That doesn't mean that baseball players and managers and management shouldn't live their lives by their moral codes, whether coming from religious belief or not, it just means that if your goal is to win baseball games, you'd better do the things that help you to win baseball games.
Update: Hello to folks visiting here from Unscrewing the Inscrutable -- please feel free to look around the place. (And thanks to ARB for the link.)
Update (8/28): More from Sane Wailingshere and here.
Uodate (8/29): Apparently, at least part of the Rockies' improvement this year over their performance last year is not due to their devotion to god, but to the humidor the balls are kept in so they don't get dried out -- except that the humidor's been in use for the last five years.
absolutist
aggresive
anti-Constitutional
anti-intellectual
arrogant
authoritarian
blame-placers
blameworthy
blinkered
buckpassers
calculating
class warriors
clueless
compassionless
con artists
conniving
conscienceless
conspiratorial
corrupt
craven
criminal
crooked
culpable
damaging
dangerous
deadly
debased
deceitful
delusional
despotic
destructive
devious
disconnected
dishonorable
dishonest
disingenuous
disrespectful
dogmatic
doomed
fanatical
fantasists
felonious
hateful
heinous
hostile to science
hypocritical
ideologues
ignorant
immoral
incompetent
indifferent
inflexible
insensitive
insincere
irrational
isolated
kleptocratic
lacking in empathy
lacking in public spirit
liars
mendacious
misleading
mistrustful
non-rational
not candid
not "reality-based"
not trustworthy
oblivious
oligarchic
opportunistic
out of control
pernicious
perverse
philistine
plutocratic
prevaricating
propagandists
rapacious
relentless
reprehensible
rigid
scandalous
schemers
selfish
secretive
shameless
sleazy
tricky
unAmerican
uncaring
uncivil
uncompromising
unconstitutional
undemocratic
unethical
unpopular
unprincipled
unrealistic
unreliable
unrepresentative
unscientific
unscrupulous
unsympathetic
venal
vile
virtueless
warmongers
wicked
without integrity
wrong-headed
Thanks to: Breeze, Chuck, Ivan Raikov, Kaiju, Kathy, Roger, Shirley, S.M. Dixon
recently seen
i've got a little list...
Elliott Abrams
Steven Abrams (Kansas BofE)
David Addington
Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson
Roger Ailes (FNC)
John Ashcroft
Bob Bennett
William Bennett
Joe Biden
John Bolton
Alan Bonsell (Dover BofE)
Pat Buchanan
Bill Buckingham (Dover BofE)
George W. Bush
Saxby Chambliss
Bruce Chapman (DI)
Dick Cheney
Lynne Cheney
Richard Cohen
The Coors Family
Ann Coulter
Michael Crichton
Lanny Davis
Tom DeLay
William A. Dembski
James Dobson
Leonard Downie (WaPo)
Dinesh D’Souza
Gregg Easterbrook
Jerry Falwell
Douglas Feith
Arthur Finkelstein
Bill Frist
George Gilder
Newt Gingrich
John Gibson (FNC)
Alberto Gonzalez
Rudolph Giuliani
Sean Hannity
Katherine Harris
Fred Hiatt (WaPo)
Christopher Hitchens
David Horowitz
Don Imus
James F. Inhofe
Jesse Jackson
Philip E. Johnson
Daryn Kagan
Joe Klein
Phil Kline
Ron Klink
William Kristol
Ken Lay
Joe Lieberman
Rush Limbaugh
Trent Lott
Frank Luntz
"American Fundamentalists"
by Joel Pelletier
(click on image for more info)
Chris Matthews
Mitch McConnell
Stephen C. Meyer (DI)
Judith Miller (ex-NYT)
Zell Miller
Tom Monaghan
Sun Myung Moon
Roy Moore
Dick Morris
Rupert Murdoch
Ralph Nader
John Negroponte
Grover Norquist
Robert Novak
Ted Olson
Elspeth Reeve (TNR)
Bill O'Reilly
Martin Peretz (TNR)
Richard Perle
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ralph Reed
Pat Robertson
Karl Rove
Tim Russert
Rick Santorum
Richard Mellon Scaife
Antonin Scalia
Joe Scarborough
Susan Schmidt (WaPo)
Bill Schneider
Al Sharpton
Ron Silver
John Solomon (WaPo)
Margaret Spellings
Kenneth Starr
Randall Terry
Clarence Thomas
Richard Thompson (TMLC)
Donald Trump
Richard Viguere
Donald Wildmon
Paul Wolfowitz
Bob Woodward (WaPo)
John Yoo
guest-blogging
All the fine sites I've
guest-blogged for:
Be sure to visit them all!!
recent listening
influences
John Adams
Laurie Anderson
Aphex Twin
Isaac Asimov
Fred Astaire
J.G. Ballard
The Beatles
Busby Berkeley
John Cage
"Catch-22"
Raymond Chandler
Arthur C. Clarke
Elvis Costello
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Philip K. Dick
Kevin Drum
Brian Eno
Fela
Firesign Theatre
Eliot Gelwan
William Gibson
Philip Glass
David Gordon
Stephen Jay Gould
Dashiell Hammett
"The Harder They Come"
Robert Heinlein
Joseph Heller
Frank Herbert
Douglas Hofstadter
Bill James
Gene Kelly
Stanley Kubrick
Jefferson Airplane
Ursula K. LeGuin
The Marx Brothers
John McPhee
Harry Partch
Michael C. Penta
Monty Python
Orbital
Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger
"The Prisoner"
"The Red Shoes"
Steve Reich
Terry Riley
Oliver Sacks
Erik Satie
"Singin' in the Rain"
Stephen Sondheim
The Specials
Morton Subotnick
Talking Heads/David Byrne
Tangerine Dream
Hunter S. Thompson
J.R.R. Tolkien
"2001: A Space Odyssey"
Kurt Vonnegut
Yes
Bullshit, trolling, unthinking knee-jerk dogmatism and the drivel of idiots will be ruthlessly deleted and the posters banned.
Entertaining, interesting, intelligent, informed and informative comments will always be welcome, even when I disagree with them.
I am the sole judge of which of these qualities pertains.
E-mail
All e-mail received is subject to being published on unfutz without identifying names or addresses.
Corrections
I correct typos and other simple errors of grammar, syntax, style and presentation in my posts after the fact without necessarily posting notification of the change.
Substantive textual changes, especially reversals or major corrections, will be noted in an "Update" or a footnote.
Also, illustrations may be added to entries after their initial publication.
the story so far
unfutz: toiling in almost complete obscurity for almost 1500 days
If you read unfutz at least once a week, without fail, your teeth will be whiter and your love life more satisfying.
If you read it daily, I will come to your house, kiss you on the forehead, bathe your feet, and cook pancakes for you, with yummy syrup and everything.
(You might want to keep a watch on me, though, just to avoid the syrup ending up on your feet and the pancakes on your forehead.)
Finally, on a more mundane level, since I don't believe that anyone actually reads this stuff, I make this offer: I'll give five bucks to the first person who contacts me and asks for it -- and, believe me, right now five bucks might as well be five hundred, so this is no trivial offer.