Saturday, September 17, 2005
 

Not again!?

(Sat Sept 17 11:09pm): I'm in no way a meterologist, so please take this with abundant caution due to my ignorance. Still, take a look at the National Hurricane Center's 3- and 5-day cones for Tropical Depression 18 as of Saturday night:


[Click on the image for the most current version of this map.]

Here's the roughly equivalent map for Katrina:



Katrina came in somewhat farther north than 18 is, and small differences can apparently make big differences in how a storm moves, but it's still rather disconcerting to see another storm taking a very roughly equivalent path as Katrina, when the Gulf coast still lies devastated, and New Orleans' flood control system is damaged.

I hope that nothing comes of it.

Here's another map, showing tropical storm force probabilities. It shows New Orleans, Biloxi and Gulfport all within the 10 - 20% probability area to see tropical storm force winds sometime in the next 5 days.


[Click on the image for the most current version of this map.]

At least one computer model puts the storm closer to New Orleans.


[Click on the image for the most current version of this map.]

I assume everyone is keeping a (excuse the expression) weather eye on this storm to see how it develops.

(Sun Sept 18 5:00am): As of the 5am update, the projected 5-day track for TD18 had shifted south somewhat, avoiding New Orleans and the Gulf. It was expected to reach tropical storm force by Monday 2am, before it began passing by Florida, near the Keys.

(Sun 3:00pm): Incidentally, just going by a visual inspection of the various computer models' predictions for Katrina, it looks as if the GFDL model (the red one above) was the most accurate of them -- with the NOGAPS (light blue) close behind it. (NOGAPS came closer to the correct landfall, but was still off by almost 150 miles, putting it near Mobile. GFDL had it even farther down the coast, near Valparaiso, Florida.) The BAM Medium model -- the yellow one which shows the TD18 approaching the closest to New Orleans -- was among the most inaccurate, which bodes well for New Orleans with TD18 (soon to be Tropical Storm Rita).

(And, as long as I'm on the subject, but not apropos of anything regarding New Orleans or the Gulf Coast, Tropical Storm -- soon to be Hurricane -- Phillipe is aimed directly at Bermuda.)

(Mon 3:30am): All 5 computer models are now showing Rita (aka TD18) heading towards Galveston. If they're right, it would make landfall there sometime on Saturday night.

(Mon 2:30pm): As of this morning's 11am advisory, Rita has reached a point much more similar to the one for Katrina I posted above (second image), and the penumbra of the 5-day forecast cone has shifted to include New Orleans, although the most likely landfall is still near Galveston:


[Click on the image for the most current version of this map.]

Mayor Nagin of New Orleans really should reconsider his decision to re-open parts of the city. I understand, I think, why he wants to take the first steps back to normality as soon as possible (he's hoping to create facts on the ground which will sap the strength of arguments against New Orleans being rebuilt), but the timing is wrong, not only because of the conditions in the city, but because of the potential for Rita to cause even more havoc.

[Post re-organized Mon Sept 19 9:20pm]

(Mon 9:30pm): The charts now put New Orleans in the 30-40% probability band to receive tropical storm force winds, and in the 5-10% band to receive hurricane force winds. Mayor Nagin has suspended the re-opening of the city.

(Mon 11:30pm): There a discussion in Kevin Drum's comments about Rita's track, including contributions from some real-life meterologists.

One point made in that discussion (which everyone should be warned contains a significant amount of right-wing b.s.) is that it won't require Rita to make landfall in Lousiana for New Orleans to be affected. Depending on how large it gets, and how powerful, there could be significance for the city even if it lands farther west. It may be that the hurricane would have to take a big turn to the southwest in order for New Orleans not to feel its effects.

(Mon/Tue 12:00 mid): The Army Corps of Engineers on the state of New Orleans water defenses:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is performing a detailed assessment of about 350 miles of hurricane levee and developing a comprehensive, prioritized plan to repair it and the pumping stations that support New Orleans and surrounding areas.

“The system in its present condition does not ensure that the city will be protected from flooding resulting from storms or hurricanes,” stressed Col. Duane Gapinski, Task Force Unwatering commander.

Gapinski says that residents may be placing their lives and property at risk by re-entering flooded areas until additional emergency levee repairs are made. State and local leaders are being informed as assessments are being completed and repairs are made. The Corps continues to work with state and local leaders to make assessments and repairs of the system.

(Tues 12:50am): Billmon points out that

if the current track were to hold, Rita would make a direct hit on Galveston Bay -- site of what is probably the largest petrochemical infrastructure complex in the western hemisphere, and front door to the USA's 4th largest city.
The petrochemical industry is, of course, already operating under its normal capacity due to Katrina. (Washington Post)
Four major Gulf Coast refineries remain idle because of Katrina, according to the Energy Department. Even before that storm, analysts had said refining capacity worldwide was struggling to meet demand.

Now analysts say they are concerned that the developing tropical storm could hit Texas, home to about 27 percent of U.S. refining capacity, according to the Energy Department.

D. Mark Routt, an analyst with Energy Security Analysis Inc. of Wakefield, Mass., said Houston is an "extremely important hub" for pipelines and other oil industry operations, adding to concern about storm damage.

Analysts said that they were concerned about damage to oil production in the gulf but that those concerns were secondary to refining.

Nearly 56 percent of daily oil production in the Gulf of Mexico remained off line yesterday because of Katrina, amounting to almost 838,000 barrels a day, according to the Minerals Management Service.

As a result, oil prices jumped up:

Oil prices soared yesterday in the largest one-day gain ever as fears mounted that a developing tropical storm could damage oil operations in the Gulf of Mexico and Texas.

U.S. benchmark crude for October delivery gained $4.39 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange to close at $67.39. That was the largest one-day dollar gain since oil started trading on the exchange in 1983, according to the Energy Department. The oil price closed at a record $69.81 on Aug. 30.

Futures prices for gasoline, natural gas and heating oil also rose yesterday.

So it's reasonable to assume that gas prices will soar again if Houston suffers a direct hit.

(Tues 5:15am): As of the 5am advisory, it looks as if the forecast models are calling for a landfall farther down the Texas coast, between Galveston and Corpus Christi, possibly moving the area of the Gulf Coast striken by Katrina farther out of reach of the worst of the storm.

(Tues 5:30pm): The National Hurricane Center 5-day projection (see first map below) still shows Hurricane Rita (which is category 2 right now) making landfall about halfway between Galveston and Corpus Christi, but the computer models (second map) are split between that place (GFDL & UKMET), Galveston (GFS & BAMM) and Brownsville (NOGAPS). Obviously, there are better and worse places for Rita to hit (the area between Corpus Christi and Brownsville is reportedly underpopulated, and Hurricane Bret, a category 4 storm, hit there in 1999 without any deaths), but given the crippled condition of New Orleans and that area of the Gulf Coast, the farther west it is, the better off for everyone. Of course, a direct hit on Houston would put the Orleanian evacuees there through their second major weather-related trauma in just a few weeks. Still, that's preferable to putting New Orleans through more flooding.

(Tues 6:00pm): From the latest Discussion issued by the NHC:

RITA CONTINUES TO BE STEERED WESTWARD AT ABOUT 13 KNOTS...BY A LARGE RIDGE OF HIGH PRESSURE ORIENTED EAST-WEST OVER THE SOUTHERN UNITED
STATES. THE RIDGE IS FORECAST TO MOVE EASTWARD LEAVING A WEAKNESS IN THE WESTERN GULF OF MEXICO. THIS PATTERN SHOULD FORCE RITA TO TURN GRADUALLY TO THE WEST-NORTHWEST AND NORTHWEST BEYOND 48 HOURS TOWARD THE TEXAS COAST.

Again, I'm not in any way a meteorologist, or even knowledgeable about the subject, but I assume that if Rita were to stall, the way Katrina did, it would not only give it more time to intensify, but the ridge guiding it would be farther to the east when the storm got out into the Gulf, which would make its turn bring it closer to the Katrina-affected areas.

If that's true (and perhaps someone who knows something about the subject can put me straight), then we should be watching to see if it continues to move away from the Keys.

BTW, it's amusing to see people in the media paying more attention to Rita's effect on the Keys than is really warranted. Wolf Blitzer was interviewing someone who stayed behind in Key West, and wanted to know why -- in the light of what happened with Katrina, why did the guy stay behind? The caller, a bar owner, seemed a little non-plussed; his attitude was, it's a category 1 hurricane, we've been through them plenty of times, this is nothing special -- and I think he was right.

Because of Katrina, and especially because of the governmental fuck-up in dealing with its aftermath, everyone's super-sensitive to the effects of hurricanes (the same thing happened in North Carolina with Ophelia: FEMA had armies of people standing by to deal with a fairly normal occurence, a category 1 storm hitting a barrier island), but Katrina was important because

  1. it was a massive category 4 storm, and might have hit as a category 5 if it hadn't weakened just before landfall, and

  2. it was heading straight for New Orleans which is below sea level and protected by a flood control system only intended for a cat 3.

Since neither of these apply to a category 1 storm hitting the Florida Keys, Blitzer's concern is misplaced -- which is why my attention here has been put on what I think is important, which is where will Rita hit, and what effect will it have on New Orleans and the Katrina-ravaged areas of the eastern Gulf Coast. That's really what's important about this story, not how many power outages there are in the Keys.

(I hit on Blitzer because he's such a satisfying target, but he's representative of the media in general.)

(Wed Sept 21 1:00pm): Rita is now category 4, with winds of 140 mph, and the computer models are currently agreed that landfall will be between Galveston and Corpus Christi, with several putting it quite close to Corpus. (I've heard quite a bit about evacuations in Galveston, but nothing about Corpus Christi, a fast-growing city of almost 300,000 people.)

A hit to the south and west of Galveston puts Houston on the "dirty" side of the storm, where there are stronger winds and larger storm surges.

(Wed 5:00pm): Rita is now category 5, with winds of 165 mph, a monster. New forecast tracks should be coming out very shortly, but at the moment it's still heading to the west of Galveston/Houston, putting those cities on the "dirty" side of the storm.

We know about Galveston being wiped out by the storm of 1900, and we've learned about New Orleans unique flooding problems, but guess what city was cited as having the worst flooding problems, second only to New Orleans?

A 1998 National Wildlife Federation study entitled "Higher Ground" ranked Houston and Harris County third and fourth of the top 200 repetitive flood loss communities in the United States. The only communities ranked higher are Jefferson Parish and New Orleans, both of which are below sea level.

More here.

(Wed 7:30pm): Rita is now the fifth third most intense hurricane on record, just behind ahead of Katrina. (8:45pm: Corrected here.)

(Wed 9:00pm): At least one of the tracking models now puts landfall directly on Galveston. The others spread out to the west a little, down to about Port Lavaca / Point Comfort, which is a major port, with a county population of about 20,000. (It's also a Texas Superfund clean-up site, due to contamination from the Alcoa plant there.)

(Wed 11:30pm): Maximum sustained winds are now 175 mph, and it's slowed down a bit, from 13 or 14 mph to 9 mph, and wobbled to the north. None of this is good news (although the NHC says that the slowing down is normal, due to the eye being reorganized). Rainfall is expected to be 8-12 inches with 15 inches in some isolated locations. The official forecast track now calls for landfall on the west end of Galveston, either a direct hit or just off of it, sometime early Saturday morning. It should land as a category 3 at minimum, but could be stronger.

(Thurs Sept 22 12:15am): Just one note: I began this post because I thought I saw a resemblence between Rita (back when it was Tropical Depression 18) and Katrina, and I was concerned about what that would mean to New Orleans and the part of the Gulf Coast devastated by the latter. Now it seems clear that Rita will, for the most past, steer clear of that area, and will instead hit somewhere in Texas, probably near Galveston. (I note that by the time Katrina had left the area of the Keys, the NHC's forecast track had an accurate read on where it would make landfall -- their advisory at 11pm EDT on Friday the 26th, about 52 hours before landfall, was substantially correct, and the next one, at 5am the next morning was dead on. Right now, Rita is about 50 some odd hours from landfall.

I'm going to close out this post and continue posting on Rita here.


[More Rita posts here.]

MAKE A DONATION TO THE RED CROSS HURRICANE 2005 FUND

Ed Fitzgerald | 9/17/2005 11:09:00 PM | | | del.icio.us | GO: TOP OF HOME PAGE







by

Ed Fitzgerald

Clowns to the left of me,
Jokers to the right,
Here I am...
site feed
2008 rules of thumb
Progressive populism!
Economic insecurity is key
Restore the balance
Cast the candidate
Persona is important
Calm,calming,assured,reassuring
Iraq, not "national security"
Prefer governors over senators
recent posts
bush countdown
oblique strategies
recent comments
some links
baseball
storm watch
(click for larger image,
refresh page to update)


topics
a progressive slogan
Fairness, progress and prosperity, because we're all in this together.

"I had my own blog for a while, but I decided to go back to just pointless, incessant barking."
(Alex Gregory - The New Yorker)
new york city
another progressive slogan
The greatest good for the greatest number, with dignity for all.
reference & fact check
iraq
write me
reciprocity
evolution v. creationism
humanism, skepticism
& progressive religiosity
more links
election prediction
HOUSE
Democrats 230 (+27) - Republicans 205

Actual:
Democrats 233 (+30) - Republicans 201 - TBD 1 [FL-13]

SENATE
Democrats 50 (+5) - Republicans 50

Actual:
Democrats 51 (+6) - Republicans 49

ELECTION PROJECTIONS SURVEY
netroots candidates
unfutz
awards and nominations
Never a bridesmaid...

...and never a bride, either!!

what I've been reading
Martin van Creveld - The Transformation of War

Jay Feldman - When the Mississippi Ran Backwards

Martin van Creveld - The Rise and Decline of the State

Alfred W. Crosby - America's Forgotten Pandemic (1989)
bush & company are...
absolutist
aggresive
anti-Constitutional
anti-intellectual
arrogant
authoritarian
blame-placers
blameworthy
blinkered
buckpassers
calculating
class warriors
clueless
compassionless
con artists
conniving
conscienceless
conspiratorial
corrupt
craven
criminal
crooked
culpable
damaging
dangerous
deadly
debased
deceitful
delusional
despotic
destructive
devious
disconnected
dishonorable
dishonest
disingenuous
disrespectful
dogmatic
doomed
fanatical
fantasists
felonious
hateful
heinous
hostile to science
hypocritical
ideologues
ignorant
immoral
incompetent
indifferent
inflexible
insensitive
insincere
irrational
isolated
kleptocratic
lacking in empathy
lacking in public spirit
liars
mendacious
misleading
mistrustful
non-rational
not candid
not "reality-based"
not trustworthy
oblivious
oligarchic
opportunistic
out of control
pernicious
perverse
philistine
plutocratic
prevaricating
propagandists
rapacious
relentless
reprehensible
rigid
scandalous
schemers
selfish
secretive
shameless
sleazy
tricky
unAmerican
uncaring
uncivil
uncompromising
unconstitutional
undemocratic
unethical
unpopular
unprincipled
unrealistic
unreliable
unrepresentative
unscientific
unscrupulous
unsympathetic
venal
vile
virtueless
warmongers
wicked
without integrity
wrong-headed

Thanks to: Breeze, Chuck, Ivan Raikov, Kaiju, Kathy, Roger, Shirley, S.M. Dixon
recently seen
Island in the Sky (1952)

Robot Chicken

The Family Guy

House M.D. (2004-7)
i've got a little list...
Elliott Abrams
Steven Abrams (Kansas BofE)
David Addington
Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson
Roger Ailes (FNC)
John Ashcroft
Bob Bennett
William Bennett
Joe Biden
John Bolton
Alan Bonsell (Dover BofE)
Pat Buchanan
Bill Buckingham (Dover BofE)
George W. Bush
Saxby Chambliss
Bruce Chapman (DI)
Dick Cheney
Lynne Cheney
Richard Cohen
The Coors Family
Ann Coulter
Michael Crichton
Lanny Davis
Tom DeLay
William A. Dembski
James Dobson
Leonard Downie (WaPo)
Dinesh D’Souza
Gregg Easterbrook
Jerry Falwell
Douglas Feith
Arthur Finkelstein
Bill Frist
George Gilder
Newt Gingrich
John Gibson (FNC)
Alberto Gonzalez
Rudolph Giuliani
Sean Hannity
Katherine Harris
Fred Hiatt (WaPo)
Christopher Hitchens
David Horowitz
Don Imus
James F. Inhofe
Jesse Jackson
Philip E. Johnson
Daryn Kagan
Joe Klein
Phil Kline
Ron Klink
William Kristol
Ken Lay
Joe Lieberman
Rush Limbaugh
Trent Lott
Frank Luntz


"American Fundamentalists"
by Joel Pelletier
(click on image for more info)


Chris Matthews
Mitch McConnell
Stephen C. Meyer (DI)
Judith Miller (ex-NYT)
Zell Miller
Tom Monaghan
Sun Myung Moon
Roy Moore
Dick Morris
Rupert Murdoch
Ralph Nader
John Negroponte
Grover Norquist
Robert Novak
Ted Olson
Elspeth Reeve (TNR)
Bill O'Reilly
Martin Peretz (TNR)
Richard Perle
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ralph Reed
Pat Robertson
Karl Rove
Tim Russert
Rick Santorum
Richard Mellon Scaife
Antonin Scalia
Joe Scarborough
Susan Schmidt (WaPo)
Bill Schneider
Al Sharpton
Ron Silver
John Solomon (WaPo)
Margaret Spellings
Kenneth Starr
Randall Terry
Clarence Thomas
Richard Thompson (TMLC)
Donald Trump
Richard Viguere
Donald Wildmon
Paul Wolfowitz
Bob Woodward (WaPo)
John Yoo
guest-blogging
All the fine sites I've
guest-blogged for:




Be sure to visit them all!!
recent listening
Smash Mouth - Summer Girl

Poulenc - Piano Music

Pop Ambient 2007
influences
John Adams
Laurie Anderson
Aphex Twin
Isaac Asimov
Fred Astaire
J.G. Ballard
The Beatles
Busby Berkeley
John Cage
"Catch-22"
Raymond Chandler
Arthur C. Clarke
Elvis Costello
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Philip K. Dick
Kevin Drum
Brian Eno
Fela
Firesign Theatre
Eliot Gelwan
William Gibson
Philip Glass
David Gordon
Stephen Jay Gould
Dashiell Hammett
"The Harder They Come"
Robert Heinlein
Joseph Heller
Frank Herbert
Douglas Hofstadter
Bill James
Gene Kelly
Stanley Kubrick
Jefferson Airplane
Ursula K. LeGuin
The Marx Brothers
John McPhee
Harry Partch
Michael C. Penta
Monty Python
Orbital
Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger
"The Prisoner"
"The Red Shoes"
Steve Reich
Terry Riley
Oliver Sacks
Erik Satie
"Singin' in the Rain"
Stephen Sondheim
The Specials
Morton Subotnick
Talking Heads/David Byrne
Tangerine Dream
Hunter S. Thompson
J.R.R. Tolkien
"2001: A Space Odyssey"
Kurt Vonnegut
Yes
archives
08/31/2003 - 09/07/2003
09/07/2003 - 09/14/2003
09/14/2003 - 09/21/2003
09/21/2003 - 09/28/2003
09/28/2003 - 10/05/2003
10/05/2003 - 10/12/2003
10/12/2003 - 10/19/2003
10/19/2003 - 10/26/2003
11/02/2003 - 11/09/2003
11/09/2003 - 11/16/2003
11/16/2003 - 11/23/2003
11/23/2003 - 11/30/2003
12/07/2003 - 12/14/2003
12/14/2003 - 12/21/2003
12/21/2003 - 12/28/2003
01/11/2004 - 01/18/2004
01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004
02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
02/29/2004 - 03/07/2004
03/07/2004 - 03/14/2004
03/14/2004 - 03/21/2004
03/21/2004 - 03/28/2004
03/28/2004 - 04/04/2004
04/04/2004 - 04/11/2004
04/11/2004 - 04/18/2004
04/18/2004 - 04/25/2004
04/25/2004 - 05/02/2004
05/02/2004 - 05/09/2004
05/09/2004 - 05/16/2004
05/16/2004 - 05/23/2004
05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004
05/30/2004 - 06/06/2004
06/06/2004 - 06/13/2004
06/13/2004 - 06/20/2004
06/20/2004 - 06/27/2004
06/27/2004 - 07/04/2004
07/04/2004 - 07/11/2004
07/18/2004 - 07/25/2004
07/25/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 08/08/2004
08/08/2004 - 08/15/2004
08/15/2004 - 08/22/2004
08/22/2004 - 08/29/2004
08/29/2004 - 09/05/2004
09/05/2004 - 09/12/2004
09/12/2004 - 09/19/2004
09/19/2004 - 09/26/2004
09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004
10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004
11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004
11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004
12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004
12/12/2004 - 12/19/2004
12/19/2004 - 12/26/2004
12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
01/02/2005 - 01/09/2005
01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005
01/16/2005 - 01/23/2005
01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005
01/30/2005 - 02/06/2005
02/06/2005 - 02/13/2005
02/13/2005 - 02/20/2005
02/20/2005 - 02/27/2005
02/27/2005 - 03/06/2005
03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005
03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005
03/20/2005 - 03/27/2005
03/27/2005 - 04/03/2005
04/03/2005 - 04/10/2005
04/10/2005 - 04/17/2005
04/17/2005 - 04/24/2005
04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005
05/08/2005 - 05/15/2005
05/15/2005 - 05/22/2005
05/22/2005 - 05/29/2005
05/29/2005 - 06/05/2005
06/05/2005 - 06/12/2005
06/12/2005 - 06/19/2005
06/19/2005 - 06/26/2005
06/26/2005 - 07/03/2005
07/10/2005 - 07/17/2005
07/17/2005 - 07/24/2005
07/24/2005 - 07/31/2005
07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005
08/07/2005 - 08/14/2005
08/14/2005 - 08/21/2005
08/21/2005 - 08/28/2005
08/28/2005 - 09/04/2005
09/04/2005 - 09/11/2005
09/11/2005 - 09/18/2005
09/18/2005 - 09/25/2005
09/25/2005 - 10/02/2005
10/02/2005 - 10/09/2005
10/09/2005 - 10/16/2005
10/16/2005 - 10/23/2005
10/23/2005 - 10/30/2005
10/30/2005 - 11/06/2005
11/06/2005 - 11/13/2005
11/13/2005 - 11/20/2005
11/20/2005 - 11/27/2005
11/27/2005 - 12/04/2005
12/04/2005 - 12/11/2005
12/11/2005 - 12/18/2005
12/18/2005 - 12/25/2005
12/25/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 01/08/2006
01/08/2006 - 01/15/2006
01/15/2006 - 01/22/2006
01/22/2006 - 01/29/2006
01/29/2006 - 02/05/2006
02/05/2006 - 02/12/2006
02/12/2006 - 02/19/2006
02/19/2006 - 02/26/2006
02/26/2006 - 03/05/2006
03/05/2006 - 03/12/2006
03/26/2006 - 04/02/2006
04/02/2006 - 04/09/2006
04/09/2006 - 04/16/2006
04/16/2006 - 04/23/2006
04/23/2006 - 04/30/2006
04/30/2006 - 05/07/2006
05/07/2006 - 05/14/2006
05/14/2006 - 05/21/2006
05/21/2006 - 05/28/2006
05/28/2006 - 06/04/2006
06/04/2006 - 06/11/2006
06/11/2006 - 06/18/2006
06/18/2006 - 06/25/2006
06/25/2006 - 07/02/2006
07/02/2006 - 07/09/2006
07/09/2006 - 07/16/2006
07/16/2006 - 07/23/2006
07/23/2006 - 07/30/2006
08/06/2006 - 08/13/2006
08/13/2006 - 08/20/2006
08/20/2006 - 08/27/2006
08/27/2006 - 09/03/2006
09/03/2006 - 09/10/2006
09/10/2006 - 09/17/2006
09/17/2006 - 09/24/2006
09/24/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 10/08/2006
10/08/2006 - 10/15/2006
10/15/2006 - 10/22/2006
10/22/2006 - 10/29/2006
10/29/2006 - 11/05/2006
11/05/2006 - 11/12/2006
11/12/2006 - 11/19/2006
11/19/2006 - 11/26/2006
11/26/2006 - 12/03/2006
12/03/2006 - 12/10/2006
12/10/2006 - 12/17/2006
12/17/2006 - 12/24/2006
12/24/2006 - 12/31/2006
12/31/2006 - 01/07/2007
01/07/2007 - 01/14/2007
01/14/2007 - 01/21/2007
01/21/2007 - 01/28/2007
01/28/2007 - 02/04/2007
02/04/2007 - 02/11/2007
02/11/2007 - 02/18/2007
02/18/2007 - 02/25/2007
02/25/2007 - 03/04/2007
03/04/2007 - 03/11/2007
03/11/2007 - 03/18/2007
03/18/2007 - 03/25/2007
03/25/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 04/08/2007
04/08/2007 - 04/15/2007
04/15/2007 - 04/22/2007
04/22/2007 - 04/29/2007
04/29/2007 - 05/06/2007
05/13/2007 - 05/20/2007
05/20/2007 - 05/27/2007
05/27/2007 - 06/03/2007
06/03/2007 - 06/10/2007
06/10/2007 - 06/17/2007
06/17/2007 - 06/24/2007
06/24/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 07/08/2007
07/08/2007 - 07/15/2007
07/29/2007 - 08/05/2007
08/05/2007 - 08/12/2007
08/12/2007 - 08/19/2007
08/19/2007 - 08/26/2007
08/26/2007 - 09/02/2007
09/02/2007 - 09/09/2007
09/09/2007 - 09/16/2007
09/16/2007 - 09/23/2007
09/23/2007 - 09/30/2007
09/30/2007 - 10/07/2007
10/07/2007 - 10/14/2007
10/14/2007 - 10/21/2007
10/21/2007 - 10/28/2007
10/28/2007 - 11/04/2007
11/04/2007 - 11/11/2007
11/11/2007 - 11/18/2007
11/18/2007 - 11/25/2007
11/25/2007 - 12/02/2007
12/02/2007 - 12/09/2007
12/09/2007 - 12/16/2007
12/16/2007 - 12/23/2007
12/23/2007 - 12/30/2007
12/30/2007 - 01/06/2008
01/06/2008 - 01/13/2008
01/13/2008 - 01/20/2008
01/20/2008 - 01/27/2008
01/27/2008 - 02/03/2008
02/03/2008 - 02/10/2008
02/10/2008 - 02/17/2008
02/17/2008 - 02/24/2008
02/24/2008 - 03/02/2008
03/09/2008 - 03/16/2008
03/16/2008 - 03/23/2008
03/23/2008 - 03/30/2008
03/30/2008 - 04/06/2008
06/01/2008 - 06/08/2008
09/21/2008 - 09/28/2008
search

search websearch unfutz

policies
Comments
Bullshit, trolling, unthinking knee-jerk dogmatism and the drivel of idiots will be ruthlessly deleted and the posters banned.

Entertaining, interesting, intelligent, informed and informative comments will always be welcome, even when I disagree with them.

I am the sole judge of which of these qualities pertains.


E-mail
All e-mail received is subject to being published on unfutz without identifying names or addresses.

Corrections
I correct typos and other simple errors of grammar, syntax, style and presentation in my posts after the fact without necessarily posting notification of the change.

Substantive textual changes, especially reversals or major corrections, will be noted in an "Update" or a footnote.

Also, illustrations may be added to entries after their initial publication.
the story so far
unfutz: toiling in almost complete obscurity for almost 1500 days
2005 koufax awards

BEST BLOG (NON-PRO)

Bradblog
Carpetbagger Report
*Crooks and Liars*
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Hullabaloo
Majikthise
Pandagon
Pharyngula
Progressive Blog Digest

BEST BLOG (PRO)

AmericaBlog
Daou Report
Media Matters
Orcinus
Political Animal
Sirotablog
*Talking Points Memo*
Think Progress
James Wolcott

*Winners*
2004 koufax winners
2003 koufax award
"best blog" nominees
r.i.p.
the proud unfutz guarantee
If you read unfutz at least once a week, without fail, your teeth will be whiter and your love life more satisfying.

If you read it daily, I will come to your house, kiss you on the forehead, bathe your feet, and cook pancakes for you, with yummy syrup and everything.

(You might want to keep a watch on me, though, just to avoid the syrup ending up on your feet and the pancakes on your forehead.)

Finally, on a more mundane level, since I don't believe that anyone actually reads this stuff, I make this offer: I'll give five bucks to the first person who contacts me and asks for it -- and, believe me, right now five bucks might as well be five hundred, so this is no trivial offer.

original content
© 2003-2008
Ed Fitzgerald

=o=

take all you want
but credit all you take.



Creative Commons License



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Buzzflash Bushisms Democratic Underground Impeach Bush Coalition