In response to the AP "analysis" I posted below, I decided to do my new survey of Electoral College predictions/projections a little ahead of schedule. (Perhaps a little too soon, considering the number of sites that haven't been updated since the last time I surveyed them.)
Now, on to predictions and projections on other sites:
[Note: From each of these websites I've taken the most comprehensive set of numbers offered, if possible without a "toss-up" category or other caveats, just Kerry versus Bush. Many of them differentiate between "solid" or "strong", "slightly" or "weak", and "leaning" or "barely" states, but I've combined them all together in order to present numbers which are as comparable as possible, so that what I'm giving is something approaching a snapshot of what people think is the current status of the Electoral College. I encourage everyone to use the links and check each site for the specifics of that site's methodology and presentation. -- Ed]
Chris Bowers (7/23): Kerry 322 - Bush 216 (no change)
Chuck Buckley (7/24): Kerry 310 - Bush 228 (was: 311-227)
Charlie Cook (7/6 - not updated since last survey): Kerry 207 - Bush 211 - ?? 120 (no update)
[*There's some controversy about what the best method is for converting the Tradesports contract data into an electoral college result. For a sometimes informative and sometimes snippy discussion (mea culpa) on that subject, see the comment thread here. Suffice to say that for my purposes here I've done the conversion by assigning any state in which the value of the Bush-wins contract is over 50 to Bush, and any state under 50 to Kerry. That seems to me to be the simplest and most transparent way to go about it, but there is disagreement about that, and another method has been suggested as being better. At this time, I am unconvinced of its merits.]
Kerry gained: 2 Kerry lost: 11 Bush gained: 9 Bush lost: 4 ?? gained: 4 ?? lost: 2 No change: 5 No update: 5
As the summary indicates, although Kerry is still out in front in terms of how many sites project him to win the Electoral College votes, he did generally lose ground in many of them. Still, losing ground when you're ahead is a far cry from being behind and having to catch up, which is the story the AP "analysis" tried to sell.
If anyone has links for any other sites that regularly track Electoral College status, please feel free to send them my way and I'll be glad to add them to the list.
Update: David Wissing's page is back up (with a new url), so I've updated his numbers and the summary. Also, my own prediction changed as a result of a new poll in Ohio, so I've changed the links and updated the numbers.
Update (7/26):National Journal's Hotline Weekly (no link because it's subscription only -- however during the conventions you can get a temporary free sub) has two different Electoral College counts today, their own, and that of Research 2000:
National Journal (7/26): Kerry 261 - Bush 202 - ?? 75
Research 2000 (7/26): Kerry 250 - Bush 211 - ?? 77
It's amusing that Hotline Weekly barely even attempts to hide their pro-Bush bias. For instance, they slugged their story about the Electoral College count not with the fact that Kerry was ahead, but that Bush was "OVER" (their caps) 200, as if being over 200 was some kind of big achievement for Bush.
In fact, as they point out themselves (reiterating a current Republican talking point), re-apportionment has meant that simply re-capturing the states won in 2000 puts Kerry at a disadvantage, since they now have 260 electoral votes to Bush's 278 (as compared to 2000's 267 to 271), which means, of course, that Kerry's current status puts him in even better shape than it appears. By Hotline's count, Kerry now has over 100% of Gore's equivalent electoral votes, while Bush, the incumbent, has only 78% of his 2000 votes. I'd hardly headline that as good news for Bush, but Hotline appears to believe it is.
Update (7/27): The new Zogby battleground numbers provoke a few changes, the most consequential of which is that Ohio (currently a toss-up assigned to Bush) goes into the Bush camp. I've updated the numbers above, and the link to my latest prediction.
Update (7/28): In response to a request, I've made the note which precedes the survey more specific about what criteria I use to select the numbers I present from each website.
absolutist
aggresive
anti-Constitutional
anti-intellectual
arrogant
authoritarian
blame-placers
blameworthy
blinkered
buckpassers
calculating
class warriors
clueless
compassionless
con artists
conniving
conscienceless
conspiratorial
corrupt
craven
criminal
crooked
culpable
damaging
dangerous
deadly
debased
deceitful
delusional
despotic
destructive
devious
disconnected
dishonorable
dishonest
disingenuous
disrespectful
dogmatic
doomed
fanatical
fantasists
felonious
hateful
heinous
hostile to science
hypocritical
ideologues
ignorant
immoral
incompetent
indifferent
inflexible
insensitive
insincere
irrational
isolated
kleptocratic
lacking in empathy
lacking in public spirit
liars
mendacious
misleading
mistrustful
non-rational
not candid
not "reality-based"
not trustworthy
oblivious
oligarchic
opportunistic
out of control
pernicious
perverse
philistine
plutocratic
prevaricating
propagandists
rapacious
relentless
reprehensible
rigid
scandalous
schemers
selfish
secretive
shameless
sleazy
tricky
unAmerican
uncaring
uncivil
uncompromising
unconstitutional
undemocratic
unethical
unpopular
unprincipled
unrealistic
unreliable
unrepresentative
unscientific
unscrupulous
unsympathetic
venal
vile
virtueless
warmongers
wicked
without integrity
wrong-headed
Thanks to: Breeze, Chuck, Ivan Raikov, Kaiju, Kathy, Roger, Shirley, S.M. Dixon
recently seen
i've got a little list...
Elliott Abrams
Steven Abrams (Kansas BofE)
David Addington
Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson
Roger Ailes (FNC)
John Ashcroft
Bob Bennett
William Bennett
Joe Biden
John Bolton
Alan Bonsell (Dover BofE)
Pat Buchanan
Bill Buckingham (Dover BofE)
George W. Bush
Saxby Chambliss
Bruce Chapman (DI)
Dick Cheney
Lynne Cheney
Richard Cohen
The Coors Family
Ann Coulter
Michael Crichton
Lanny Davis
Tom DeLay
William A. Dembski
James Dobson
Leonard Downie (WaPo)
Dinesh D’Souza
Gregg Easterbrook
Jerry Falwell
Douglas Feith
Arthur Finkelstein
Bill Frist
George Gilder
Newt Gingrich
John Gibson (FNC)
Alberto Gonzalez
Rudolph Giuliani
Sean Hannity
Katherine Harris
Fred Hiatt (WaPo)
Christopher Hitchens
David Horowitz
Don Imus
James F. Inhofe
Jesse Jackson
Philip E. Johnson
Daryn Kagan
Joe Klein
Phil Kline
Ron Klink
William Kristol
Ken Lay
Joe Lieberman
Rush Limbaugh
Trent Lott
Frank Luntz
"American Fundamentalists"
by Joel Pelletier
(click on image for more info)
Chris Matthews
Mitch McConnell
Stephen C. Meyer (DI)
Judith Miller (ex-NYT)
Zell Miller
Tom Monaghan
Sun Myung Moon
Roy Moore
Dick Morris
Rupert Murdoch
Ralph Nader
John Negroponte
Grover Norquist
Robert Novak
Ted Olson
Elspeth Reeve (TNR)
Bill O'Reilly
Martin Peretz (TNR)
Richard Perle
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ralph Reed
Pat Robertson
Karl Rove
Tim Russert
Rick Santorum
Richard Mellon Scaife
Antonin Scalia
Joe Scarborough
Susan Schmidt (WaPo)
Bill Schneider
Al Sharpton
Ron Silver
John Solomon (WaPo)
Margaret Spellings
Kenneth Starr
Randall Terry
Clarence Thomas
Richard Thompson (TMLC)
Donald Trump
Richard Viguere
Donald Wildmon
Paul Wolfowitz
Bob Woodward (WaPo)
John Yoo
guest-blogging
All the fine sites I've
guest-blogged for:
Be sure to visit them all!!
recent listening
influences
John Adams
Laurie Anderson
Aphex Twin
Isaac Asimov
Fred Astaire
J.G. Ballard
The Beatles
Busby Berkeley
John Cage
"Catch-22"
Raymond Chandler
Arthur C. Clarke
Elvis Costello
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Philip K. Dick
Kevin Drum
Brian Eno
Fela
Firesign Theatre
Eliot Gelwan
William Gibson
Philip Glass
David Gordon
Stephen Jay Gould
Dashiell Hammett
"The Harder They Come"
Robert Heinlein
Joseph Heller
Frank Herbert
Douglas Hofstadter
Bill James
Gene Kelly
Stanley Kubrick
Jefferson Airplane
Ursula K. LeGuin
The Marx Brothers
John McPhee
Harry Partch
Michael C. Penta
Monty Python
Orbital
Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger
"The Prisoner"
"The Red Shoes"
Steve Reich
Terry Riley
Oliver Sacks
Erik Satie
"Singin' in the Rain"
Stephen Sondheim
The Specials
Morton Subotnick
Talking Heads/David Byrne
Tangerine Dream
Hunter S. Thompson
J.R.R. Tolkien
"2001: A Space Odyssey"
Kurt Vonnegut
Yes
Bullshit, trolling, unthinking knee-jerk dogmatism and the drivel of idiots will be ruthlessly deleted and the posters banned.
Entertaining, interesting, intelligent, informed and informative comments will always be welcome, even when I disagree with them.
I am the sole judge of which of these qualities pertains.
E-mail
All e-mail received is subject to being published on unfutz without identifying names or addresses.
Corrections
I correct typos and other simple errors of grammar, syntax, style and presentation in my posts after the fact without necessarily posting notification of the change.
Substantive textual changes, especially reversals or major corrections, will be noted in an "Update" or a footnote.
Also, illustrations may be added to entries after their initial publication.
the story so far
unfutz: toiling in almost complete obscurity for almost 1500 days
If you read unfutz at least once a week, without fail, your teeth will be whiter and your love life more satisfying.
If you read it daily, I will come to your house, kiss you on the forehead, bathe your feet, and cook pancakes for you, with yummy syrup and everything.
(You might want to keep a watch on me, though, just to avoid the syrup ending up on your feet and the pancakes on your forehead.)
Finally, on a more mundane level, since I don't believe that anyone actually reads this stuff, I make this offer: I'll give five bucks to the first person who contacts me and asks for it -- and, believe me, right now five bucks might as well be five hundred, so this is no trivial offer.