The days grow short as the election approaches, and I'm going to try my very best to start presenting this survey of Electoral College tracking / prediction / projection / forecast / scoreboard / map sites on a biweekly basis from now on. At the same time, I'll also be tightening up my criteria for how long I'll keep in the survey a site which hasn't been updated. Two weeks is the current allowance, but that will change to 10 days for the next iteration, and then for the next one, one week. Just before the election, I may choose to make it even more restrictive.
It's also worth mentioning that I'll be flying to London for business late in the evening on October 30th. That's where I'll be for Election Day, and whether I'll be able to do a survey while I'm there depends on my work schedule and the availability of internet access. I'll certainly do everything I can to put something together, but there's always the possibility that October 30th will be the last survey I publish.
I believe all this means that if everything works out just perfectly, I'll be putting out surveys on Thursday 21 October, Sunday 24 October, Wednesday 27 October, Saturday 30 October (in the a.m.), and possibly on Monday 1 November from London.
Be that as it may, here's this week's edition:
ELECTORAL COLLEGE TRACKING SITES
Larry Allen (10/15 - updated) Kerry 243 - Bush 268 - ?? 27 (IA, ME, MO, NV) (was: 247-278-13)
AP (10/16 - restored): Kerry 217 - Bush 222 - ?? 99 (was: 211-237-90 on 9/14)
Bloomberg (10/17): Kerry 164 - Bush 178 - ?? 196 (no change)
Chris Bowers (10/17): Kerry 291 - Bush 247 (was: 296-242)
Business Week (10/13): Kerry 239 - Bush 237 - ?? 62 (FL, OH, MN, NM) (was: 247-237-54)
Brian Calhoun (10/18): Kerry 247 - Bush 291 (no change)
CBS (10/17): Kerry 217 - Bush 222 - ?? 99 (was: 207-242-89)
Alcon San Croix (10/18 - updated): Kerry 241 - Bush 255 - ?? 42 (IA, NM, OH, WI) (was: 241-292-5)
SF Chronicle (10/15 - news report): Kerry 179 - Bush 202 - ?? 157 (new to survey)
(Note: One of the numbers given in the Chronicle article is not correct. The toss-up states they list represent 157 electoral votes, not 153.)
Benjamin Schak (10/17): Kerry 264 - Bush 274 (was: 244-294)
(Note: I believe there is a arithmetical error in Schak's numbers, because his votes add up to more than 538. I've taken his list of states and added up their electoral votes to come up with the numbers here.)
Search The Links (10/15): Kerry 238 - Bush 261 - ?? 39 (NH, NM, OH, WI) (was: 254-266-18)
Robert Silvey (10/14): Kerry 247 - Bush 291 (was: 243-295)
MODE: Kerry 247 [n=6] - Bush 291 [n=4] (was: 247-264-27)
JOINT MODE: Kerry 247 - Bush 291 [n=4] (was: 247-291)
"Mean" is what is colloquially called "average." All items are added up and divided by the number of items.
"Median" is the center point, the middle value in a list. There are as many values larger than the median as there are values that are smaller.
"Mode" is the number in a list which appears the most times. The "n=" number indicates how many times the number listed appears.
"Joint Mode" is the combination of Kerry and Bush counts which appears most frequently in the survey. The "n=" number indicates how many times it appears.
RANGE Kerry max: 327 (325) Kerry min: 164 (153)
Bush max: 303 (311) Bush min: 157 (167)
SUMMARY
The gap between Bush and Kerry continued to close this week, but at a slower rate than last week, and primarily due to losses by Bush and not gains by Kerry. Kerry stayed essentially where he was, with 247 to 250 electoral votes, but Bush lost around 8 to 11 votes and ended up at 253 to 255. The net result is that Bush's roughly 50 vote lead of two weeks ago (which had been reduced down to about 15 votes last week) shrank once again, and Bush now leads Kerry by only 5 or 6 votes. However, neither candidate has enough votes to be the clear winner at this point.
Bush and Kerry are basically tied in the number of sites that list each as winning (20 for Bush, versus 19 for Kerry), but Bush has an edge in the number of sites listing him as ahead (15, versus 8). The 27 sites that showed Kerry ahead or winning was an improvement over last week for him (when he had 16 sites), while Bush's 35 sites was a slight drop from last week (38).
(Please see the note in "Updates" below concerning the original text of this summary.)
UPDATES & CORRECTIONS
For a few days after I publish the survey, I'll update figures, make corrections, and add new sites that come to my attention. I'll note these changes here, and mark the entry for each altered site when appropriate.
As I wrote in the introduction, my hope is to go biweekly, so the next iteration of the survey is planned to be on Thursday 21 October.
(10/18) A number of sites updated after I originally posted earlier this evening, so as I've come across them I've marked them as updated, changed their numbers, refigured the averages and re-written the summary to match.
(10/18) If I may interject an editorial comment, one wonders what, exactly, has to happen for Larry Sabato to make a change in his projection.
(10/18) I made an egregious error in the original text of my summary (and then Blogger compounded it by somehow swallowing the correction I wrote) -- I wrote that approximately equal numbers of sites showed Bush and Kerry ahead or winning. This was not true at the time I wrote it (before the various sites were updated), nor is it true now. Bush at the time of the original posting had 24 sites showing him winning and 12 showing him ahead, for a total of 36. Kerry, on the other hand, had 17 showing him winning and 10 showing him ahead, a total of 27. Somehow I took 17 and 10 and added them in my head to come up with 37, which just ain't right. I've now rewritten the summary to correct the error (for the second time), and I apologize for the mistake.
(10/19) Sam Wang has started to include the effect of the split of undecideds into his meta-analysis, and apparently I inadvertantly took the wrong set of numbers (without undecideds) off his site. Since this is in the nature of a correction, I've updated his entry and revised the averages and summary.
(10/19) The new Zogby interactives came out today, and their analysis puts things at Kerry 264 - Bush 274. This will be included in the next iteration of the survey, just a few days from today.
(10/20) Here's something interesting: back when I first started providing averages, I posted two sets, one for all sites, and one for sites without unassigned states (i.e. no ties or toss-ups). Later I dropped the second set, but I'm toying with the idea of bringing it back, in order to give more of a sense of where we stand once "leaners" have been accounted for. Looking at this particular survey, the "sites without ??" mean is Kerry 269 - Bush 269, and the median is Kerry 267 - Bush 271, which, I think, underlines what we already knew, that the race at this point is all but tied, with Bush very slightly ahead.
From each website I've taken the most comprehensive set of numbers offered, if possible without a "toss-up" category or other caveats, just Kerry versus Bush. Many of them differentiate between "solid" or "strong", "slightly" or "weak", and "leaning" or "barely" states, but I've combined them all together in order to present numbers which are as comparable as possible.
I encourage everyone to use the links and check each site for the specifics of that site's methodology and presentation.
My convention is that Kerry is listed first and Bush second, bold type indicates a winning candidate (i.e. 270 electoral votes or more), and italics or underlining indicates a leading candidate.
Sites which haven't updated in a while will be temporarily removed from the list until they're freshened. For the first half of October I'll keep a "stagnant" site in the survey about 2 weeks. From the middle of October until the election, that will tighten up to a week at most, and perhaps less.
One-time Electoral College analysis articles from the news media (as opposed to ongoing features) will be included, but only for a single iteration of the survey (or one week, if I ever start doing it more often than once a week), unless replaced by a new article.
As always, if anyone has links for any other sites that regularly track Electoral College status, please feel free to send them my way and I'll be glad to add them to the list. I'm also more than happy to hear from the proprietors of any of the sites surveyed here, should they have any complaints, comments, or suggestions for improvements.
NOT INCLUDED
The following sites from the last survey have been removed for the reasons indicated:
ABC (The Note) (10/11 - news report): Kerry 231 - Bush 213 - ?? 94 (one-time news report)
The Gadflyer (average of 18 predictions; 9/30 - news report): Kerry 284 - Bush 254 (one-time news report)
absolutist
aggresive
anti-Constitutional
anti-intellectual
arrogant
authoritarian
blame-placers
blameworthy
blinkered
buckpassers
calculating
class warriors
clueless
compassionless
con artists
conniving
conscienceless
conspiratorial
corrupt
craven
criminal
crooked
culpable
damaging
dangerous
deadly
debased
deceitful
delusional
despotic
destructive
devious
disconnected
dishonorable
dishonest
disingenuous
disrespectful
dogmatic
doomed
fanatical
fantasists
felonious
hateful
heinous
hostile to science
hypocritical
ideologues
ignorant
immoral
incompetent
indifferent
inflexible
insensitive
insincere
irrational
isolated
kleptocratic
lacking in empathy
lacking in public spirit
liars
mendacious
misleading
mistrustful
non-rational
not candid
not "reality-based"
not trustworthy
oblivious
oligarchic
opportunistic
out of control
pernicious
perverse
philistine
plutocratic
prevaricating
propagandists
rapacious
relentless
reprehensible
rigid
scandalous
schemers
selfish
secretive
shameless
sleazy
tricky
unAmerican
uncaring
uncivil
uncompromising
unconstitutional
undemocratic
unethical
unpopular
unprincipled
unrealistic
unreliable
unrepresentative
unscientific
unscrupulous
unsympathetic
venal
vile
virtueless
warmongers
wicked
without integrity
wrong-headed
Thanks to: Breeze, Chuck, Ivan Raikov, Kaiju, Kathy, Roger, Shirley, S.M. Dixon
recently seen
i've got a little list...
Elliott Abrams
Steven Abrams (Kansas BofE)
David Addington
Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson
Roger Ailes (FNC)
John Ashcroft
Bob Bennett
William Bennett
Joe Biden
John Bolton
Alan Bonsell (Dover BofE)
Pat Buchanan
Bill Buckingham (Dover BofE)
George W. Bush
Saxby Chambliss
Bruce Chapman (DI)
Dick Cheney
Lynne Cheney
Richard Cohen
The Coors Family
Ann Coulter
Michael Crichton
Lanny Davis
Tom DeLay
William A. Dembski
James Dobson
Leonard Downie (WaPo)
Dinesh D’Souza
Gregg Easterbrook
Jerry Falwell
Douglas Feith
Arthur Finkelstein
Bill Frist
George Gilder
Newt Gingrich
John Gibson (FNC)
Alberto Gonzalez
Rudolph Giuliani
Sean Hannity
Katherine Harris
Fred Hiatt (WaPo)
Christopher Hitchens
David Horowitz
Don Imus
James F. Inhofe
Jesse Jackson
Philip E. Johnson
Daryn Kagan
Joe Klein
Phil Kline
Ron Klink
William Kristol
Ken Lay
Joe Lieberman
Rush Limbaugh
Trent Lott
Frank Luntz
"American Fundamentalists"
by Joel Pelletier
(click on image for more info)
Chris Matthews
Mitch McConnell
Stephen C. Meyer (DI)
Judith Miller (ex-NYT)
Zell Miller
Tom Monaghan
Sun Myung Moon
Roy Moore
Dick Morris
Rupert Murdoch
Ralph Nader
John Negroponte
Grover Norquist
Robert Novak
Ted Olson
Elspeth Reeve (TNR)
Bill O'Reilly
Martin Peretz (TNR)
Richard Perle
Ramesh Ponnuru
Ralph Reed
Pat Robertson
Karl Rove
Tim Russert
Rick Santorum
Richard Mellon Scaife
Antonin Scalia
Joe Scarborough
Susan Schmidt (WaPo)
Bill Schneider
Al Sharpton
Ron Silver
John Solomon (WaPo)
Margaret Spellings
Kenneth Starr
Randall Terry
Clarence Thomas
Richard Thompson (TMLC)
Donald Trump
Richard Viguere
Donald Wildmon
Paul Wolfowitz
Bob Woodward (WaPo)
John Yoo
guest-blogging
All the fine sites I've
guest-blogged for:
Be sure to visit them all!!
recent listening
influences
John Adams
Laurie Anderson
Aphex Twin
Isaac Asimov
Fred Astaire
J.G. Ballard
The Beatles
Busby Berkeley
John Cage
"Catch-22"
Raymond Chandler
Arthur C. Clarke
Elvis Costello
Richard Dawkins
Daniel C. Dennett
Philip K. Dick
Kevin Drum
Brian Eno
Fela
Firesign Theatre
Eliot Gelwan
William Gibson
Philip Glass
David Gordon
Stephen Jay Gould
Dashiell Hammett
"The Harder They Come"
Robert Heinlein
Joseph Heller
Frank Herbert
Douglas Hofstadter
Bill James
Gene Kelly
Stanley Kubrick
Jefferson Airplane
Ursula K. LeGuin
The Marx Brothers
John McPhee
Harry Partch
Michael C. Penta
Monty Python
Orbital
Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger
"The Prisoner"
"The Red Shoes"
Steve Reich
Terry Riley
Oliver Sacks
Erik Satie
"Singin' in the Rain"
Stephen Sondheim
The Specials
Morton Subotnick
Talking Heads/David Byrne
Tangerine Dream
Hunter S. Thompson
J.R.R. Tolkien
"2001: A Space Odyssey"
Kurt Vonnegut
Yes
Bullshit, trolling, unthinking knee-jerk dogmatism and the drivel of idiots will be ruthlessly deleted and the posters banned.
Entertaining, interesting, intelligent, informed and informative comments will always be welcome, even when I disagree with them.
I am the sole judge of which of these qualities pertains.
E-mail
All e-mail received is subject to being published on unfutz without identifying names or addresses.
Corrections
I correct typos and other simple errors of grammar, syntax, style and presentation in my posts after the fact without necessarily posting notification of the change.
Substantive textual changes, especially reversals or major corrections, will be noted in an "Update" or a footnote.
Also, illustrations may be added to entries after their initial publication.
the story so far
unfutz: toiling in almost complete obscurity for almost 1500 days
If you read unfutz at least once a week, without fail, your teeth will be whiter and your love life more satisfying.
If you read it daily, I will come to your house, kiss you on the forehead, bathe your feet, and cook pancakes for you, with yummy syrup and everything.
(You might want to keep a watch on me, though, just to avoid the syrup ending up on your feet and the pancakes on your forehead.)
Finally, on a more mundane level, since I don't believe that anyone actually reads this stuff, I make this offer: I'll give five bucks to the first person who contacts me and asks for it -- and, believe me, right now five bucks might as well be five hundred, so this is no trivial offer.